It may be due to the fact that it was the first
Shakespeare play that I had seen off of a high school stage, but it had such a
huge effect on me. When you read the play, you do not grasp the full meaning of
everything. These books were meant to be seen, something blaringly obvious when
you sit down and watch them. The biggest difference between books lines being
read and being performed? Timing. The timing of each line changed the entire
meaning. Also, the facial expressions of those acting made the scenes much more
intriguing. I never want to only read a Shakespeare play again. I want to see
them, too.
The
Tempest was much funnier than I had taken it to be when I
read the book. This I attribute to the amazing actors who were in the play and
the director for having them act the way they did. Roger Allam’s Prospero was
phenomenal. His voice seemed perfectly strong and forceful which was how I
imagined the character’s voice. I liked that Prospero was a caring father who
not only seemed to care for his daughter, but was kind enough to look after
Caliban despite his dislike of him. Despite using Ariel as a slave, I felt
there was affection there to an extent like what one has for their pet when it
does something remarkable. The line of Prospero’s that made how clear the
difference was between reading the play and watching it was Act 1, Sc. 2, when
Ferdinand meets Miranda and Prospero. When reading line 576, “Hence! Hang not
on my garments”, I had read it as a relatively monotone line. When in the play,
it was hilarious because he was struggling to free himself from her grasp and
delivered the line through gritted teeth to just her alone. It made much more
sense and gave the entire scene humor. Whenever he called her “Wench”, it has a
funny tinge to it as well since he very clearly enunciated the word.
I always thought that Trinculo and Stephano’s
sections of the book were ridiculous and unnecessary. All they did was drink! It seemed useless,
until I saw them in the play. They were incredibly funny and watching them made
me think that they really did have more of a part in the story than I had
originally thought. Another actor who, though in the book seemed very minor,
appeared much better on stage was Ferdinand. His part in the scheme is very
small, basically only to marry Miranda, but the actor they chose made the part
seem much more fun and necessary. There is not much, I believe, one can do with
Ferdinand’s lines, so this actor’s acting was superb. His facial expressions
and body language made his entire character. It was adorable just how love
struck he was by making the faces he did.
Another huge strength for this rendition of The Tempest was the music. I had not
expected so much music especially since there were only a few songs by Trinculo
and Stephano in the book. I really liked their idea to add music though. It
sounded great and you could really get into it. Having a dance number for the
final bows was incredibly entertaining. There was so little that I disliked
about this play because everything was really good in my opinion. I felt that
the director did a great job for the majority of the play.
While the majority of the play was absolutely
amazing, the one big flaw for me was the scene where Ariel comes in as a harpy.
Up until the banquet appears, you are completely engrossed in the play and then
suddenly there is fire and Ariel in a harpy outfit with the weirdest wings in
existence. It was incredibly distracting, the costume he was wearing. The metal
footgear and the people carrying his wings were just too much. I also do not
think that the scene was practiced or choreographed well enough. The actors
were falling before the wings even moved, which bothered me extremely as
someone who wants to be a director. I would not have liked that at all. And the
fire was the only special effect in the entire play which made it quite jarring
to the audience. And as much as I like Colin Morgan as an actor, I felt Ariel’s
lines were not strong enough for the scene. It felt like he was just reciting
them. The monologue from Act 3, Sc. 3 when read seems very biting, accusatory,
and can be downright frightening. I do not think it was strong enough.
Overall, I had one of the best experiences of my
life that I will hopefully remember for the rest of my life. It was so overwhelming
to be there at first, but I got sucked into it. The interpretation of the play
was far higher than the expectations I had. I cannot wait to see the next play
there.
No comments:
Post a Comment